Aston Villa complete the loan signing of Alejandro Garnacho from Chelsea
Garnacho has been exiled by Manchester United and Chelsea in the space of a year. Why has Unai Emery invited him into the Villa tent?
One of football’s underrated thrills is looking at what other clubs are doing and asking what the hell they think they’re playing at.
Anyway, Aston Villa have signed Alejandro Garnacho from Chelsea. It’s an initial season-long loan deal and widely reported to include a ‘conditional obligation’ to buy. If those unknown conditions are met, Villa will pay a transfer fee and Garnacho will become a Villa player.
Modern Premier League football being what it is, there are some considerations that need addressing off the bat.
First, Harvey Elliott. Villa took the Liverpool youngster on loan last season, also with a conditional obligation to buy, and spent the season dodging that obligation at all costs after deciding they didn’t want to complete the deal.
This looks different. Every report emphasises that Unai Emery is the man behind the move and that’s fundamentally not the same situation as Elliott. Garnacho has joined Villa because Emery wants him.
Did you know you can make Aston Villa Review a preferred source on Google? This will help your Google services surface our work more frequently and that’s good for both of us. Give it a try!
Second, this transfer is the result of Villa and Chelsea working together to strike mutually beneficial deals once more. Let’s not pretend otherwise.
The terms might be designed to give them deniability when UEFA comes calling but this is absolutely one of the reasons Chelsea were willing to spend a British record transfer fee to buy Morgan Rogers.
I have no issue with Villa and Chelsea operating within the rules, even if those rules seem to be chasing after them – I’d wager the detailed regulations are changed again before the next summer transfer window precisely to outlaw this specific flavour of collusion.
But it is what it is. The financial regulations under which Villa are operating appear to be achieving exactly the opposite of their stated objectives of sustainability and fairness.
Equally, I don’t think clubs should be able to spend whatever and whenever they want.
It’s almost as if restrictions should first be applied to clubs who aren’t in the Champions League but can tempt away the players of those who are, but what do I know?
Garnacho arrives at Villa
At 22, Garnacho is another example of Roberto Olabe, Villa’s president of football operations, seeking to put his stamp on the club’s transfer strategy.
Villa are buying young but bold. For every player they’ve lost in this difficult week or two, Olabe and Emery have brought in a younger player of a slightly different profile.
It’s going to be exciting to see how things change on the pitch but Villa’s ability to improve players over a number of years and still have time to sell them for good fees is essential to the club’s future plans.
This is who Villa must be and Garnacho, while there is risk attached for sure, is part of that evolution.
“I can’t wait to start on the pitch,” Garnacho told VillaTV. “It’s an important club that is growing really quickly, so I can’t wait to get started.
“I was looking for a club to get confidence at and to try to be the player I was in my first years at Manchester United.
“I spoke with the manager and I think he will give me the confidence to be here and to help the team.”
Aston Villa Review reaction
Hitting those heights is the only way to make this arrangement work.
Garnacho arrives with a dreadful reputation, doubted on the pitch and downright iffy off it. That’s kid stuff and it’s time for him to grow up. This is a big boy football club with low levels of tolerance for bullshit.
I’ve had messages from supporters of multiple clubs expressing their forthright views on Garnacho and wondering aloud why Villa would sign him.
Independent football writing needs your support.
Upgrade now for our wraparound match coverage of every Aston Villa first team fixture and other features for just £4 per month.
I don’t think the answer to that is a complicated one. Emery and Villa believe that Garnacho’s playing potential is worth the gamble that he’s ready to demonstrate some professionalism, and that they can provide the environment for that to happen.
That’s it. There’s nothing more to it – even the financial stuff wouldn’t force Emery to take on a player he didn’t rate. Indeed, the truth appears to be quite the opposite.
Just as I was and am more convinced than Emery about Elliott, so I am less convinced than Emery about Garnacho. Only one of us is a five-time Europa League winner.
I’ve questioned some of the Villa manager’s one-off decisions in the past but I know better than to suspect the overall direction could be better. I’m not one to trust a manager without supporting evidence but Emery is so far beyond that point that it’s basically academic to even wonder.
More from Aston Villa Review
3️⃣ The Holy Trinity: Aston Villa conclusions from friendly win at Walsall
🕵🏻♂️ Everything you need to know about new Aston Villa signing João Gomes
🕵🏻♂️ Everything you need to know about new Aston Villa signing Johan Manzambi
The Garnacho deal moved quickly once it became public knowledge but it has been out in the open for a few days so I’ve already had my say elsewhere.
I wrote a column about it for FourFourTwo, essentially arguing that bringing Garnacho to Villa is a show of Emery’s extreme confidence in his methods.
We also discussed Garnacho briefly in the first episode of our newly reconfigured Aston Villa Review podcast, for which I was joined by Steve and Jamie to talk about Villa’s midfield merry-go-round.
Suffice to say I’m not exactly bursting with faith that signing Garnacho is a smart move. I’d be surprised if it worked out to the fullest.
But I am not Unai Emery. When it comes down to it, I don’t know shit.


